EN

RU CN

Popular services

All services

A trademark allows you to legally secure the rights to a name, logo, packaging or slogan. Its registration is necessary for the legal use of the brand, protection against copying and participation in commercial turnover.

Trademark registration

Registration and maintenance of intellectual property includes legal expertise, registration of rights to trademarks, inventions, software, industrial designs and other IP objects. The service helps businesses protect their developments, minimize the risks of legal disputes and build a manageable system of ownership of intangible assets.

Registration and maintenance of intellectual property and rights

Compensation for harm and losses to legal entities covers a set of legal actions to protect the property interests of business. The service includes legal analysis of the situation, assessment of real damage and lost profits, collection of evidence, preparation of claims and lawsuits, negotiation and representation in court.

Compensation for damage, losses to legal entities

Compliance

Sanctions compliance and consulting includes a legal assessment of the risks associated with the current US, EU, UK and Russian sanctions. We check counterparties, analyze contracts and corporate structure, build an internal control system to protect your business from blocking, fines and loss of reputation.

Sanctions compliance and consulting

International Business Expansion

The entry of business into foreign markets opens up new opportunities for expansion and increase in profits, but at the same time poses a number of serious challenges for entrepreneurs. Support of foreign companies and structures is a range of professional services that include business registration abroad, tax optimization, legal and accounting support, as well as assistance in opening bank accounts. The key goal of such services is to provide entrepreneurs with a confident start and stable development of business abroad, eliminating legal, tax and administrative risks.

Support of foreign companies and structures

Все услуги

Contact us

Leave a request and our lawyers will contact you shortly to provide a consultation on your issue.

Имя *
Это поле обязательно для заполнения
Телефон *
Это поле обязательно для заполнения
E-mail
Введён некорректный e-mail
Сообщение
Поле проверки на робота должно быть заполнено.
Необходимо ваше согласие на обработку персональных данных

About Us

We specialize in providing legal support for modern international businesses and dispute resolution. Our approach is centered on efficiency, reducing bureaucratic hurdles, and delivering clear, actionable legal solutions. That is why our clients include leading IT companies, developers, and entrepreneurs worldwide.

We understand that time is a crucial asset when launching and running a business. Instead of dealing with legal complexities, focus on your growth while we handle the legal aspects.

Our team comprises experienced lawyers, legal analysts, and IT specialists who have developed numerous successful legaltech solutions under the SmartAct brand.

We simply solve complex problems. Try our services and see the difference!

More about us

Legal Team

Managing Partner

Daniil Kadyrov

I specialize in property law, commercial disputes, private international law, IT, and e-commerce.

Опыт more than 8 years

Языки English, Chinese

Образование National Research University Higher School of Economics (LLB, LLM)

Lawyer

Ksenia Parfenova

I specialize in intellectual property protection, IP rights registration and management.

Опыт more than 5 years

Языки English, German

Образование National Research University Higher School of Economics (LLB, LLM)

Partner

Vladimir Rogulin

I specialize in civil and commercial disputes, arbitration, corporate criminal defense, trade compliance and intellectual property protection.

Опыт more than 22 years

Языки Russian, English

Образование Moscow Academy of Law and Management (specialist degree)

More about the team

Why Choose Us?

20+

Jurisdictions

800+

Satisfied Clients

Long-term Results

Our expert legal strategies streamline business processes and ensure desirable outcomes, even in complex litigation cases

Unique Legal Solutions for Every Jurisdiction

Our deep international expertise allows us to offer customized solutions beyond standard legal service packages

Industry Expertise & Recognition

Our specialists publish in leading legal journals, shaping industry trends and reinforcing their authority in the legal field

Collaboration with Market Leaders

We work with major corporations and key market players

46 years

Of Combined Experience

Our proprietary legaltech developments

More about services

SmartIndex

An automated service that provides the ability to calculate the indexation of awarded monetary amounts, create an application and send it to the court online.

Go to service

Cancellation of a court order

A modern solution that allows you to cancel a court order in just a few minutes. The service automatically generates an application and sends it to the court.

Go to service
Подробнее о сервисах

Articles and publications

Procedural Law

Proving Debt Settlement and Lifting Execution Restrictions in Russian Enforcement Proceedings

Resolving active asset freezes and account restrictions after a commercial debt has been fully settled is a frequent procedural challenge within Russian enforcement proceedings. Due to administrative workloads and technical lags within the Federal Bailiff Service, debtors often encounter situations where payments are processed, yet asset seizures remain active or funds are mistakenly debited twice. Navigating this stage successfully requires precise evidentiary documentation, strict adherence to statutory verification steps, and formal procedural filings to compel bailiffs to officially close enforcement cases and lift restrictions.

Procedural Law

Debt Installment and Deferral Strategies in Russian Commercial Court Enforcement

Securing a delay or installment schedule for court-ordered debt payments provides a legitimate mechanism to restructure financial obligations without incurring catastrophic cash flow disruptions or collateral enforcement losses. Under the Russian procedural framework, commercial entities and private debtors can apply to the competent court to modify enforcement timelines, adjust payment delivery mechanics, or establish structured installments. Successfully navigating these procedural requests requires establishing documented objective grounds, proving operational solvency, maintaining a fair balance between creditor recovery rights and debtor viability, and complying with statutory court fee requirements.

Procedural Law

Appealing Judicial Bailiff Actions and Omissions in Russian Debt Enforcement

Navigating debt enforcement proceedings under Russian law frequently involves procedural delays, missed statutory timelines, and administrative omissions by the Federal Bailiff Service. With millions of active enforcement cases generating substantial travel and operational restrictions, understanding how to challenge unlawful decrees, administrative inaction, or calculation errors is essential for both creditors seeking efficient recovery and debtors defending against procedural overreach. Utilizing administrative and judicial appellate mechanisms requires precise adherence to strict procedural windows, evidentiary documentation, and formal drafting standards.

Procedural Law

Protected Assets and Statutory Income Immunities in Russian Debt Recovery

Russian debt enforcement legislation provides robust statutory protections for specific compensation funds, social benefits, and subsistence income limits. Understanding the legal nature of these protected assets is vital, as enforcement agencies and banking institutions frequently encounter commingled funds and erroneous account write-offs. For international creditors, private individuals, and corporate entities navigating execution proceedings, navigating statutory immunities, banking identification codes, and exception rules ensures procedural compliance while preventing unlawful asset deprivations.

Procedural Law

Enforcement Proceedings in Russia: Bailiff Procedures, Statutory Timelines, Execution Measures, and Debtor Protection Limits

Commercial debt enforcement across the Russian Federation relies heavily on the systemic actions of the Federal Bailiff Service, which initiates millions of enforcement cases annually involving massive financial volumes. Understanding how bailiffs track corporate and personal assets, execute enforcement measures, apply income retention caps, and handle debtor protections is essential for both creditors maximizing recovery and debtors maintaining legal compliance. Navigating the regulatory framework requires precise adherence to statutory timelines, asset priority rules, and formal appeal mechanisms.

Procedural Law

Proving Debt Settlement and Lifting Execution Restrictions in Russian Enforcement Proceedings

Resolving active asset freezes and account restrictions after a commercial debt has been fully settled is a frequent procedural challenge within Russian enforcement proceedings. Due to administrative workloads and technical lags within the Federal Bailiff Service, debtors often encounter situations where payments are processed, yet asset seizures remain active or funds are mistakenly debited twice. Navigating this stage successfully requires precise evidentiary documentation, strict adherence to statutory verification steps, and formal procedural filings to compel bailiffs to officially close enforcement cases and lift restrictions.

Procedural Law

Debt Installment and Deferral Strategies in Russian Commercial Court Enforcement

Securing a delay or installment schedule for court-ordered debt payments provides a legitimate mechanism to restructure financial obligations without incurring catastrophic cash flow disruptions or collateral enforcement losses. Under the Russian procedural framework, commercial entities and private debtors can apply to the competent court to modify enforcement timelines, adjust payment delivery mechanics, or establish structured installments. Successfully navigating these procedural requests requires establishing documented objective grounds, proving operational solvency, maintaining a fair balance between creditor recovery rights and debtor viability, and complying with statutory court fee requirements.

Procedural Law

Appealing Judicial Bailiff Actions and Omissions in Russian Debt Enforcement

Navigating debt enforcement proceedings under Russian law frequently involves procedural delays, missed statutory timelines, and administrative omissions by the Federal Bailiff Service. With millions of active enforcement cases generating substantial travel and operational restrictions, understanding how to challenge unlawful decrees, administrative inaction, or calculation errors is essential for both creditors seeking efficient recovery and debtors defending against procedural overreach. Utilizing administrative and judicial appellate mechanisms requires precise adherence to strict procedural windows, evidentiary documentation, and formal drafting standards.

Procedural Law

Protected Assets and Statutory Income Immunities in Russian Debt Recovery

Russian debt enforcement legislation provides robust statutory protections for specific compensation funds, social benefits, and subsistence income limits. Understanding the legal nature of these protected assets is vital, as enforcement agencies and banking institutions frequently encounter commingled funds and erroneous account write-offs. For international creditors, private individuals, and corporate entities navigating execution proceedings, navigating statutory immunities, banking identification codes, and exception rules ensures procedural compliance while preventing unlawful asset deprivations.

Procedural Law

Enforcement Proceedings in Russia: Bailiff Procedures, Statutory Timelines, Execution Measures, and Debtor Protection Limits

Commercial debt enforcement across the Russian Federation relies heavily on the systemic actions of the Federal Bailiff Service, which initiates millions of enforcement cases annually involving massive financial volumes. Understanding how bailiffs track corporate and personal assets, execute enforcement measures, apply income retention caps, and handle debtor protections is essential for both creditors maximizing recovery and debtors maintaining legal compliance. Navigating the regulatory framework requires precise adherence to statutory timelines, asset priority rules, and formal appeal mechanisms.

Go to the knowledge base

FAQ

Can we sign a legal services agreement?

Yes, we ensure transparency in our partnerships by outlining all terms, responsibilities, and expected outcomes in a formal contract.

Can I get a consultation, and how much does it cost?

We offer a free initial consultation to help you understand your situation, assess your options and determine what services you need. Our lawyers will analyse your case and suggest the best way to achieve the desired outcome. If you decide to continue working with us, the cost of the consultation will be included in the total price of the service. We are committed to providing quality legal assistance focused on your needs and guarantee transparency in pricing.

Can a debtor recover funds if the bailiff mistakenly executes a duplicate write-off after full settlement?

Yes. Debtors can file a formal application requesting the return of excessively collected funds, supported by bank statements displaying both the original settlement and the secondary erroneous debit.

What steps should be taken if a bank continues to freeze accounts after the bailiff has issued a restriction-lifting order?

The debtor should immediately obtain a certified copy of the bailiff's revocation order and deliver it directly to the bank's legal compliance or execution department to accelerate system updates.

What documents are required to prove that a debt was paid directly to the creditor?

Debtors must provide a bank transfer receipt or payment confirmation alongside an official written receipt, letter, or reconciliation act signed by the creditor acknowledging receipt of funds.

Why do bank account restrictions remain active even after a debt has been fully paid?

Restrictions often persist due to administrative backlogs, commingled case files, or unpaid executive fees assessed for failing to satisfy the debt during the initial voluntary compliance period.

What is the statutory timeframe for a bailiff to close an enforcement proceeding after receiving payment proof?

Bailiffs are statutorily required to issue an order terminating the enforcement proceeding within three business days of receiving official verification of full debt settlement.

What is the primary operational difference between a judicial installment plan and a court-approved settlement agreement?

A judicial installment plan modifies enforcement timelines for an existing judgment without altering the underlying debt obligations, whereas a court-approved settlement agreement represents a mutual compromise between parties that can redefine total debt terms, interest, and payment structures.

Is it permissible to request a debt installment schedule if part of the judgment has already been collected?

Yes. Prior partial debt clearance serves as compelling evidence of debtor good faith, significantly increasing the likelihood that the court will approve an installment plan for the remaining balance.

Does a court order granting a debt installment automatically lift active bank account freezes?

Not automatically. Bailiffs must adjust enforcement measures to align with the judicial schedule once presented with the court order, requiring proactive delivery and procedural follow-up by the debtor.

Where must an application for execution installment or deferral be submitted?

The petition must be submitted directly to the court that rendered the initial judgment or issued the execution writ, after which certified rulings are delivered to the executing bailiff office.

Does a judicial bailiff have the statutory authority to grant a debt installment schedule independently?

No. Bailiffs lack statutory authority to grant installments or deferrals independently; they can only enforce active court judgments or modify procedures pursuant to a certified judicial order.

Can a debtor apply for a court debt installment schedule if bailiff enforcement proceedings are already active?

Yes. Debtors can apply for judicial installments or deferrals at any stage of active enforcement proceedings, and the assigned bailiff is legally bound to adapt execution measures once the court order is issued.
All questions and answers

Client Reviews

All reviews

I appreciate the work of the legal team. They helped me win a complex court case, explaining everything in great detail. Thank you!

D

Daniel W.

Grateful to the legal experts for resolving my tax dispute. They handled all the documentation and achieved a successful outcome!

R

Robert D.

Consulted regarding an international contract and was impressed with the detailed analysis and recommendations.

L

Lucas P.

Contact us

Leave a request and our lawyers will contact you shortly to provide a consultation on your issue.

Имя *
Это поле обязательно для заполнения
Телефон *
Это поле обязательно для заполнения
E-mail
Введён некорректный e-mail
Сообщение
Поле проверки на робота должно быть заполнено.
Необходимо ваше согласие на обработку персональных данных